Friday, March 19, 2010

Red Jacket's Reply to a Christian Missionary

When the Reverend Mr. Cram came to Buffalo Creek, New York in 1805 to convert the Seneca Indians there to Christianity, the Seneca Chief Red Jacket answered him in the following very eloquent reply (read the full version here):
Brother, our seats were once large and yours were small. You have now become a great people, and we have scarcely a place left to spread our blankets. You have got our country, but are not satisfied; you want to force your religion upon us.

Brother, continue to listen. You say that you are sent to instruct us how to worship the Great Spirit agreeably to His mind; and, if we do not take hold of the religion which you white people teach we shall be unhappy hereafter. You say that you are right and we are lost. How do we know this to be true? We understand that your religion is written in a Book. If it was intended for us, as well as you, why has not the Great Spirit given to us, and not only to us, but why did He not give to our forefathers the knowledge of that Book, with the means of understanding it rightly. We only know what you tell us about it. How shall we know when to believe, being so often deceived by the white people?

Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?

Brother, we do not understand these things. We are told that your religion was given to your forefathers and has been handed down from father to son. We also have a religion which was given to our forefathers and has been handed down to us, their children. We worship in that way. It teaches us to be thankful for all the favors we receive, to love each other, and to be united. We never quarrel about religion.

Brother, the Great Spirit has made us all, but He has made a great difference between His white and His red children. He has given us different complexions and different customs. To you He has given the arts. To these He has not opened our eyes. We know these things to be true. Since He has made so great a difference between us in other things, why may we not conclude that He has given us a different religion according to our understanding? The Great Spirit does right. He knows what is best for His children; we are satisfied.

Brother, we do not wish to destroy your religion or take it from you. We only want to enjoy our own.

Brother, you say you have not come to get our land or our money, but to enlighten our minds. I will now tell you that I have been at your meetings and saw you collect money from the meeting. I can not tell what this money was intended for, but suppose that it was for your minister; and, if we should conform to your way of thinking, perhaps you may want some from us.

Brother, we are told that you have been preaching to the white people in this place. These people are our neighbors. We are acquainted with them. We will wait a little while and see what effect your preaching has upon them. If we find it does them good, makes them honest, and less disposed to cheat Indians, we will then consider again of what you have said.
It appears that Mr. Cram got pwn3d.

As a sidenote, my own pluralistic philosophy of religions is very similar to Red Jacket's in several respects.

6 comments:

Happy Lost Sheep said...

Serious pwnage no doubt. Red Jacket brings up some great points. I like your view of pluralism in that it encourages appreciation of and respect for other faiths. Interesting how one of your professors saw pluralism as a threat.

Chris said...

Thanks, HLS! Many of Red Jacket's arguments are arguments I've used myself, in arguing for pluralism. The American Indians were no dummies!

Jeffrey said...

Chris, This is some really good stuff. I liked your above posting of the giant turtle myth as well.
Do you find the profs at your current institution are more receptive to the idea of a Christian pluralism?
Incidentally, (while i'm posting, i might as well comment on everything i read) I was a history major in undergrad, and I can personally attest to the validity of all you said. I take no personal offense.
Keep on sharing what you think and what you read: It's worth "hearing."

Chris said...

Thanks, Jeffrey, for reading and for the kind comments. :-) Yes, CGU is much, much more accepting of my theologically liberal ideas. Unlike Wheaton, it's not a religiously affiliated school.

Mike said...

After that conversation, the Missionary refused to shake Red Jacket's hand when the meeting ended. He could not shake hands with "a man that was in league with the devil".

Chris said...

Well, the minions of the devil sure give good speeches! :-)